Arturo Vasquez is starting what looks to be a very interesting series on "The Rise and Fall of Neo-Thomism" on his blog:
http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-rise-and-fall-of-thomism-part-i/#more-5651
He deconstructs the notion that a particular philosophical school is somehow the "correct" one or even the "traditional" one for Catholics (as much as the SSPX might try to insist in its discussions...)
http://arturovasquez.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/the-rise-and-fall-of-thomism-part-i/#more-5651
He deconstructs the notion that a particular philosophical school is somehow the "correct" one or even the "traditional" one for Catholics (as much as the SSPX might try to insist in its discussions...)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are welcome to disagree with me and with each other. Civil debate is a valuable way to test and exchange ideas. Do keep it civil, though. Any really offensive craziness will either be held up as an example of What We Don't Stand For, or deleted.